cleantech
cleantech insights

All of the Lights: Not LEDs, says Lumiette

Josh Gould

Even those with only cursory exposure to the lighting industry have heard about LEDs (light-emitting diodes).  Extremely energy efficient and manufactured in a process analogous to semi-conductors, LEDs have spawned a tremendous amount of corporate activity – from heavyweights like Philips making major LED pushes, to high profile startups like Bridgelux and Lemnis Lighting (all of which we cover in our lighting industry analysis here).

But despite all the LED hype – which is particularly strong here in an innovation hub like Silicon Valley – has anyone stopped to recognize that over 80% of the installed base of lights are still “old school” fluorescents and incandescents?  And have all those LED enthusiasts encountered some of the (admittedly debatable) complaints about LED light color and quality?  Further, does anyone realize that the biggest ESCOs like Johnson Controls are still almost entirely swapping old fluorescent fixtures for newer ones, instead of installing LEDs or fancy lighting controls systems?

Lumiette is a Silicon Valley based flourescent lighting startup playing to these contrarian facts.  Founded in 2007 by lighting and semiconductor industry veterans, the company has IP around an ultra-efficient, flat panel lamp with cathodes on the exterior; moving the electrode from the inside to the outside of the lamp, and ensuring that no filaments need to be evaporated.  The result is 50 lumens per watt (many LEDs are 45), a lamp life of 25,000 hours, which is nearly 5 times the life of a traditional dimming CFL.  But Lumiette’s device will retail for a similar price of $16-18, compared to LEDs which are anywhere from mid $30s to $40s.  From a $5.6 million Series A, the company has developed manufacturing facilities in Korea, a strategic partnership in China, and is selling through distributors.  The company is currently looking for $5M in a Series B.

Before we all jump on the Lumiette/CFL train, let’s keep in mind that LEDs have been decreasing in price 20-25% annually, and steadily improving performance.  It’s not clear whether Lumiette can accomplish the same feat.  Moreover, like many lighting companies, Lumiette will have to adopt a go-to-market strategy that accounts for the dominance of large lighting companies in the sales and distribution channels, and find a capital-efficient way to scale its manufacturing and production.  Nevertheless, it’s heartening to see that lighting industry innovation extends beyond the LED and the lighting control system.  To achieve real cost and energy savings in buildings and homes, we will need all lighting weapons at our disposal – LEDs, control systems, and yes – the boring, old fluorescent. 

Josh Gould is a Director at Cleantech Group.

More Cleantech Group Research (subscription required):

Digital Lumens Company Insight

NeoPac Group Company Insight

Advanced Lighting Market Insight: Overview & Segmentation Analysis

Asia LEDs Illuminating the Path From East to West

To get this and other Cleantech Insights stories delivered weekly to your inbox, sign up for the Inside Cleantech Newsletter:

 


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or create a trackback from your own site.

  • Bkottman

    Agreed that the induction or cold cathode fluorescent (not sure which technology is bing presented, the Lumiette product link is broken on their website) is a reasonable technology, midling in terms of cost and efficacy (lumens/watt).  As you state, it could be a helpful niche technology.
    However, the reason standard T8 and T5 linear fluorescent are bing installed RIGHT NOW is the high efficacy (up to 90 lumens/watt) and low cost ($1.50-$10 each).  Linear fluorescent is stil the right/green solution for lighting the majorty of commercial spaces. 

  • http://www.efficiencyengineering.com Mike Thomas

    Lighting is a very sophisticated industry with more technical dimensions than most people realize.  Comparing technologies only on lumens per watt is way too simplistic (e.g. older technologies like HPS and LPS can produce over 150 lumens per watt).  The only measure that gets any traction is installed ROI, where t8 with reflector conversions win hands down until all the t12 lamps are gone.