cleantech
cleantech insights

Biofuels 2.0: Going back to the future?

Josh Gould

I should start by pointing out I’m not Cleantech Group’s biofuels analyst (my colleague Stephen Marcus in London has that well-deserved title).  Nor do I claim to have deep expertise in biofuels.  My focus is on energy storage and energy efficiency.

But recent developments have led me to pay more attention to biofuels.  The most obvious development is an oil price climbing past $100 a barrel.  By conventional wisdom – about which we should always be skeptical – we are still in the early stages of an economic recovery.  As that recovery strengthens, we typically see upward pressure on the price of oil.  Given that we are “starting” at $100, it seems there is at least the potential for very high oil prices.  And this is to say nothing of potential effects from ongoing political turmoil in the Middle East.

The difficulty for oil companies (or cleantech investors, for that matter) is making investment decisions today about companies, technologies, and refining capacity that will not be fully realized for years.  While few are on record betting on continued high prices, investors are making predictions with their wallets.  Witness recent biofuels deals by major oil companies (here or here).   Anecdotally, an acquaintence at a biofuels company mentioned that his company was investing in two major refining facilities in the U.S. because current prices give them “margin for error” even if their projections of future prices are wrong.

Why should anyone believe this new wave of investment will not end in failed companies and empty wallets circa 2009?  One reason to be optimistic is growing interest in using biofuel companies’ core technology for different end-uses, like consumer products.  In fact, a client who is the head of a major fabric care business unit at one of the world’s largest consumer products companies expressed a deep interest in biofuels because detergent is, of course, largely based on petroleum-related chemicals.  Biofuels companies help consumer product companies produce a range of chemicals by reducing or eliminating petroleum inputs.

Consumer product companies are betting that biofuel companies can find and refine continuous supplies of switchgrass, corn, algae, etc. at stable – albeit often higher – prices.  Oil, on the other hand, is subject to geopolitical uncertainty and price shocks, traveling to developed countries primarily en route from the Middle East.  Interestingly, being environmentally responsible doesn’t appear to be a key motivator for these investment decisions; the emphasis is on guaranteeing a secure supply and a stable price.

So we’re unlikely to go back to the future (circa 2006-2008), where pipe dreams of rapid worldwide adoption of cheap biofuels motivated investment.  Instead, we’re entering a more sober and mature era where large corporates fuel the growth of the biofuel industry as part of a broader risk management and supply chain strategy, not in order to be green.  While it may be less exciting than “Biofuels 1.0″, the current approach is likely to be longer-lasting than the earlier version.

To get this and other Cleantech Insights stories delivered weekly to your inbox, sign up for the Inside Cleantech Newsletter:

 


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or create a trackback from your own site.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve noticed the same uptick in biofuels ideas as well, especially algae biofuels. Are there any companies you know of that are using algae to create consumer products?

  • http://cleanenergycapitalllc.com Scott Brittenham

    I think a key point, as you mentioned, in assessing the future of Cleantech in America, is the turmoil in the Middle East. It seems evident that for an extended period of time oil prices will continually face upward pressure due to political unrest in major oil producing counties. Thus, there needs to be an alternative and I believe investors will continue to become more aware of this apparent fact.

  • http://cleanenergycapitalllc.com Scott Brittenham

    I think a key point, as you mentioned, in assessing the future of Cleantech in America, is the turmoil in the Middle East. It seems evident that for an extended period of time oil prices will continually face upward pressure due to political unrest in major oil producing counties. Thus, there needs to be an alternative and I believe investors will continue to become more aware of this apparent fact.

  • Josh Gould

    Hi Susanna,

    Apologies for the delayed response.

    Not intended to be a comprehensive list but two big names using algae to create consumer products who immediately come to mind are Aurora Algae (http://www.aurorainc.com/) and Solazyme (http://www.solazyme.com/).

    Many more making consumer products (or more accurately, the chemicals that are precursors to consumer products) from biofuels other than algae.

  • Sam Salamay

    “Pie in the sky” algae and cellulosic parity with big oil pricing will never be realized. The only real solution is an economic development/distributed fuel producer for farmers and local communities to prosper. EPEC Biofuels has the model for accelerating energy independence from fossil fuels. We cannot allow corporate powers in-charge to take our grant and incentive monies for R&D efforts in advanced biofuels. It is impossible to replicate nature, which is why our preferred energy crop, sweet sorghum is far superior than any existing feedstock. In fact, sweet sorghum is to the US what sugarcane is to Brazil. I invite you to discover what will be the norm in producing clean and cost-effective ethanol, home-grown by our partner, the farmer. Go to http://www.homegrownbiofuels.com